Recent reports surrounding high level of lead in artificial turf may, on the surface, be alarming. Just put, FieldTurf is safe and the science is there to prove it. Let 's review some of the extensive toxicology reports, testing , studies and supporting research.
1 - Background
Synthetic turf is, and has always been safe. In over 40 years of EPA oversight and OSHA-regulated manufacturing, there is no scientific or medical evidence that synthetic turf poses a human health or environmental risk from lead (or from any other material used in While there was not over 40,000 cases in european lead, there was not one case developed by synthetic turf and there was not one single case developed since synthetic turf was introduced in the US marketplace over 40 years ago.
Lead chromate is a stable compound that was widely used by yarn manufacturers until around 2002 in the form of Chrome Yellow to create colorfast yarns that would not leach or "bleed."
Dr. Davis Lee, Ph.D., Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Executive in Residence at the Georgia, Institute of Technology School of Polymer, Textile, and Fiber Engineering, said "If a green synthetic turf field containing lead chromate is still green, then the chromate is still in the yarn. If the Yellow Chromate had leached out, the field would probably be blue.
The chemistry of lead chromate is completely different than lead carbonate that was used in household paint.
"State clinical and forensic toxicologist, Dr. David Black, Ph.D., of Aegis Sciences Corporation.," Lead chromate is stable when encapsulated in the fiber is not readily absorbed by the body.
Lead chromate was chosen for use in the carpet industry because chemists and toxicologists consider it a safe compound when encapsulated in extruded yarn.
According to Dr. Lee, "If synthetic yarns containing lead chromate are burned, the lead in the lead chromate "can be released into the atmosphere."
Even though there are no similar regulations concerning the disposal of carpet was lead by chromium in synthetic turf was actually lead-free by around 2003. Importantly, there are never any health concerns over lead chromate in synthetic turf either in the US Egypt in Europe.
Until very recently, lead chromate has been used in bright yellows and some cases, in the pigment used in in yellow yarn that makes up the lines on some FieldTurf soccer fields. Even though the use of lead chromate in these applications is completely safe, we have moved away from the use of any lead chromate to eliminate any confusion with our consumers over product safety.
2 - Key Findings
Testing three fields in New Jersey with elevated lead levels, the NJDHSS focused on the bioaccessibility of synthetic turf, which it defines as "the fraction of a Findings validated the Synthetic Turf Council 's position, based on science and expert opinion, that lead chromate & # 39; s extremely low bioavailability priors it being being readily absorbed by the human body.
From its tests, the NJDHSS reported that the three fields available for absorption in the intestine, which is where food altered by stomach acid is absorbed by the blood and lymphatic systems, ranged from 2.5% to 11 In practical terms, it is virtually impossible for a child to be at risk from synthetic turf:
Of synthetic turf to be at risk of absorbing sufficient lead to equal the minimum threshold of elevated blood lead.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission "should not chronically ingest more than 15 micrograms of lead per day from consumer products." Putting these test results in perspective, polymer and fiber engineering specialist Dr. Davis Lee calculated that a child playing on the three New Jersey fields would have to wipe his fingers on the turf and put them in his mouth 750 times in a day to receive enough lead to equal the CPSC threshold level.
Dr. David Black done the same tests as the NJDHSS, using the same protocol during late May, which showed an average bioaccessibility of 4%. The results of the two tests are similar and validate the safety of synthetic turf, including the synthetic turf NJDHSS reported to contain concentrations of lead chromate of between 3,400 and 4,700 part per million.
3 - The Facts
o Lead does not leach from synthetic turf.
o Bioavailability of lead from pigment is extremely low.
o Lead from dust at Ironbound (NJ) was tested and is not an inhalation hazard.
o Ironbound (NJ) children with regular exposure to the artificial turf field test normal
o Worker exposed to turf and particles for 30 years tests normal.
o Even assuming 50% bioavailability, the amount of ingested turf required to pose a risk is absurdly unrealistic.
The potential for hazard is determined by several factors, including bioavailability, the proportion of a chemical that is actually absorbed.
According to State of New Jersey Deputy Commissioner and State Epidemiologist Dr. Eddy Bresnitz, results concluded that the group had blood lead levels equal to or less than those tested in Therefore, the Ironbound field did not result in elevated lead levels in the children from the Ironbound neighborhood.
The synthetic turf fields at the Old Tappan and Demarest High Schools, which initially had been closed, was sampled on June 6, 2008. The testing lead in the green turf fiber at concentrations of 4000 mg / kg (Old Tappan field) and 6300 mg / kg (Demarest field).
However, when Dust Wipe sampling was on the filed Northern Valley (Old Tappan and Demarest) fields in New Jersey the results of the wipe test produced results between 10-35 μg / wipe which falls below the EPA guideline for dust on floors (40 μg ) and Interior Window Sills (250 μg).
Both fields were repeatedly re-opened.
4. Wipe Testing, Explained
The hysteria can be attributed to improper testing methods "high lead levels" is not that to done the chemical composition of the fiber. Simply put, it does not assess bioavailability of potential health effects .
With this method, which is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard for hospitals ans schools, a known surface area (1 square foot) of the field is addressed in both directions (up and down, back and forth) with a lead-free This result can be compared to the EPA and HUD floor dust clearance standard of 40 μg (μg / ft 2). / ft 2. The reason is that the dust clearance standard is based on daily year-round exposures of young children in their homes, whereas exposures at the field would be largely to older children and of less frequency.
5 - What The Experts Say
US Consumer Product Safety Commission
"There is no indication that exposure to the turf could pose any harm. [that] communities shut down their playing fields. "
The Center for Disease Control (CDC)
"Testing on FieldTurf fields have consistently shown 10-20 ppm or less than 5% of the lead level considered as problematic."
"No cases of elevated blood lead levels in children have been linked to artificial turf on athletic fields in New Jersey and elsewhere."
The New York Department of Health and Mental Hygience
"Based on existing HUD Guidelines and EPA standards, lead hazard risk assessments at these four DPR synthetic turf fields did not identify lead hazards.
Toxicologist Barbara D. Beck
"The NJ and EPA soil standards of 400 mg / kg are based on an assumption that small children may ingest approximate 100 mg Thus, comparing the concentration of lead in the turf fiber to an acceptable soil lead concentration is not an accurate way to evaluate the human health risk from exposure to lead in turf fibers and is likely to overestimate risk, because of the turf fiber is unquestionably to be ingested (if at all) to the same amount as lead in soil.
When people play on the field, they may get on the field, they may get dust onto their hands or other exposed skin, and transfer the dust in their Lead has no appreciable absorption through the skin, and the inhalation of dust from the field is expected to be minimal, as any dust is likely to adhere to the turf fiber or rubber crumb padding rather than becoming airborne. "
(Dr. Beck is a lecturer in Toxicology at Harvard; Former Chief of Air Toxics Staff in Region I EPA; Fellow, Interdisciplinary Programs in Health at the Harvard School of Public Health)
New Jersey Department of Health
852 ppm of lead - more than double the state - issued safe standard of 400 mg / kg. , once the problem wipe testing was done the field was re-opened ...
Montville OKs use of field after latest lead test - Daily Record (May 8, 2008)
Patrick Guilmette, a representative for PMK, explained at Wednesday & # 39; s at the Wednesday & # 39; s meeting that the lead samples of the turf, and did not appear in the samples of dust, wipes and blades of artificial grass taken from the field.
"In other words, the lead is encapsulated in the fibers inside the turf and not leaching out to the surface to be ingested," Guilmette said.
Township Health Officer, John Wozniak also received an e-mail Wednesday from James Brownlee, State Director of Consumer and Environmental Health Services. Brownlee confirmed the negative results from the fiber, dust and wipe samples, as with with Wozniak, in the e-mail .
But Brownlee recommended that the township discontinue watering the fields to limit dust, in light of the negative results. Water bound the the which is the breaking down, watering the fields is not necessary.
"My recommendation would be to be sure to have field managers monitor each field and look at potential degradation results that may result in matrix material becoming accessible," Brownlee wrote.
Based on the state & # 39; s recommendation, the committee voted in favor of re-opening the fields without restrictions.
6 - The City of New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
Lead hazard risk assessment was acquired at four DPR synthetic turf fields from 3/11/08 to 3/12/08 by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH). The risk assessment was acquired in accordance with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) "Guidelines for Evaluation and Control of Lead-based Paint Hazards in Housing" (HUD Guidelines) by a DOHMH Associate Public Health Sanitation and EPA certified Lead Risk Assessment. The risk assessment included a visual inspection of each site and collection of environmental samples for lead in dust, bare soil and deteriorated paint.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines
The following stringent test method was used to determine the bioavailability of the encapsulated lead in the fields:
o EPA 40 CFR - 745.65 (b) defines a dust - lead hazard as surface dust in a residential dwelling or child occupied facility that contains a mass - per - area concentration of lead equal to or exceeding 40 μg / ft 2 on floors or 250 μg / ft 2 on interior window sills based on wipe samples. All dust wipe samples with compared with the EPA limit of 40 μg / ft 2 on floors.
Some on results of the presence of lead in the synthetic turf carpet fibers in the fields at West 27th Street and 10th Avenue , West 103 rd Street and Riverside Drive, and East 120th Street and Park Avenue.
Note - Even though the total lead concentrations in the turf fiber excluded soil criteria, New York City concluded that, because of the low lead in dust concentrations, none of the four fields tested presented a lead hazard.
7. Field Testing at Northern Valley
The synthetic turf fields at the Old Tappan and Demarest High Schools were sampled on June 6, 2008. The testing lead found in the green turf fiber at concentrations of 4000 mg / kg (Old Tappan field) and 6300 mg / kg (Demarest field) .
However, when Dust Wipe sampling was on the filed Northern Valley (Old Tappan and Demarest) fields in New Jersey, the results of the wipe test produced results between 10-35 μg / wipe which falls below the EPA guideline for Dust on Floors 40 μg) and Interior Window Sills (250 μg).
